ShopDreamUp AI ArtDreamUp
Deviation Actions
Why is this?
If you shoot a German in 1944, you're a patriot.
If you shoot a German in 1946, you're a murderer.
If you shoot a German in 1996, you're a bigot.
If you kill an Arab in 1 BC, you're moral.
If you kill an Arab in 34 AD, you're immoral.
If you kill an Arab in 1200 AD, you're moral.
If you kill an Arab in 2000 AD, you're a criminal.
If you kill an Arab in 2002 AD, you're a patriot.
If you kill an Arab in 2017 AD, you're a bigot.
Okay, I'm not saying that I want to go out and start shooting people, but it would really be helpful to know which rules to follow and which rules to ignore.
It already ticks me off that I'm not supposed to holler, "Fag!" at people who are being jerks anymore.
It ticks me off even more that in another 30 years, I probably won't be allowed to call anybody, "Jerk!" because it will be deemed insensitive to masterbaters.
Who put these cultural enforcers in charge? Oh! So, I'm not allowed to say, "Fag!" anymore but you're allowed to misspell "the" and massacre the use of apostrophes? Screw that! (or is "screw" a bad word now too?)
Tell you what: you have my permission to continue to assume that I'm a rich white male religious hetero cis Republican bigot of European ancestry and first-world privilege who spits on little Chinese boys and owned black slaves, and I'll stop concluding that you're an illiterate idiot who doesn't use spelling, grammar, and syntax correctly.
(Uh, is this the part where I'm supposed to let the microphone fall to the floor in some sort of non-verbal message that my target audience has been sufficiently humiliated? I'm pretty sure the impact would damage the audio equipment, and the club owner was kind enough to let me come up here to say my bit with her microphone. I'm just going to switch it off and put it back atop its stand instead.)
If you shoot a German in 1944, you're a patriot.
If you shoot a German in 1946, you're a murderer.
If you shoot a German in 1996, you're a bigot.
If you kill an Arab in 1 BC, you're moral.
If you kill an Arab in 34 AD, you're immoral.
If you kill an Arab in 1200 AD, you're moral.
If you kill an Arab in 2000 AD, you're a criminal.
If you kill an Arab in 2002 AD, you're a patriot.
If you kill an Arab in 2017 AD, you're a bigot.
Okay, I'm not saying that I want to go out and start shooting people, but it would really be helpful to know which rules to follow and which rules to ignore.
It already ticks me off that I'm not supposed to holler, "Fag!" at people who are being jerks anymore.
It ticks me off even more that in another 30 years, I probably won't be allowed to call anybody, "Jerk!" because it will be deemed insensitive to masterbaters.
Who put these cultural enforcers in charge? Oh! So, I'm not allowed to say, "Fag!" anymore but you're allowed to misspell "the" and massacre the use of apostrophes? Screw that! (or is "screw" a bad word now too?)
Tell you what: you have my permission to continue to assume that I'm a rich white male religious hetero cis Republican bigot of European ancestry and first-world privilege who spits on little Chinese boys and owned black slaves, and I'll stop concluding that you're an illiterate idiot who doesn't use spelling, grammar, and syntax correctly.
(Uh, is this the part where I'm supposed to let the microphone fall to the floor in some sort of non-verbal message that my target audience has been sufficiently humiliated? I'm pretty sure the impact would damage the audio equipment, and the club owner was kind enough to let me come up here to say my bit with her microphone. I'm just going to switch it off and put it back atop its stand instead.)
What Do Characters Think When the Book Closes?
I wonder if the characters from my favorite cancelled t.v. shows or RPG campaigns ever look up into their skies and have this sense that the stars over their heads went black, that the book cover was closed for the last time, that their existence was entombed and forgotten in a box underneath the stairs? Or put another way… Macbeth, Act 5, Scene 5 “Life is but a walking shadow, a poor player who struts and frets his hour upon the stage, and then is heard no more. It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”
Iron Mask Deserves More Love
I rented Iron Mask (2019). If its title doesn't ring a bell, Iron Mask is the American title of the adventure/fantasy movie where Arnold Schwarzenegger is dressed as a British redcoat while warning Jackie Chan that no one escapes the Tower of London. It might not win Oscars, but it's happy with what it is. Is Iron Mask for everybody? Nope. (Some people still dislike Star Wars.) Iron Mask is hard to classify, but it reminded me of a mix among: Around the World in 80 Days, Big Trouble in Little China, Detective Dee, The Princess Bride, Dungeons and Dragons: Honor of Thieves, and Xena: Warrior Princess. Note: while my own political views regarding Putin and Xi might ordinary detract from a film which was made in Russia and The People's Republic of China, I DO think this movie deserves more love. All politics aside, I like Iron Mask. (It was also filmed in the Czech Republic, which is one of the few countries in the world that still seems to not hate my country. Thank you, Czech
My Muse Is Too Far Ahead of Me
It could be the harsher-than-usual winter weather which is sabotaging my artistic productivity in recent weeks, but I've had a frustrating type of art block where I ironically do know what I want to create. I'm inspired by someone whose work I admire, but I don't have the skills or the gear to do what that artist does. When I have time off to sit down and work on the art project I have in mind, it just ends up being busywork where all I get out of it is a reminder that I will never get anywhere close to the level of the artist whose work inspires me. It's like I'm firing a gun with no bullets. "Oh, look! That shot would have been a bullseye if I actually had bullets. Or a gun." (Then you didn't actually get a bullseye, did you?) There's this frustration where every time I'm driving or walking somewhere through the snow, I'm thinking about the art project, but when I sat down to work on it, it was a waste of everyone's time. I hate that.
Atheists and Christians and Soup
Y'know, I'll bet that when YouTube and TikTok atheists complain about organized religion, they're forgetting that back in the day, a major selling point of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam (in chronological order) was, "Our God doesn't do human sacrifices." That was a really good deal in comparison to the competition! Unfortunately, I think this benefit of no-human-sacrifices stopped being appreciated several centuries ago. In 2023 A.D., it's like seeing an ingredients label which states, "This can of vegetable soup was not built with lead solder or radioactive cesium," or, "This physician washes his hands, with soap!" or, "This day care center promises to not sell your children while you're at work." I think monotheism gets a bum rap nowadays.
© 2017 - 2024 Puppetcancer
Comments2
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
And in reading this, I paused for a moment in offense that you're not happy you can't say "fag" any longer, but I thought more into that and realized that my offense at that proved your point exactly.
When I was of the age when your superiority was determined by who could call you the most offensive name you could think up, "fag" was unacceptable. Don't read that as, "we didn't use the word," just that, "be prepared for an ass chewing and subsequent lecture if an adult heard you use it." It's not that we didn't say "fag," we just made sure we said it out of earshot of adults. I used it before I understood what it really meant and how it was intended to hurt a certain group of people, and I'm not proud of that, but I am also not going to pretend I didn't use it while hurling insults at kids who pissed me off. I'm not perfect.
But when you were growing up in a time a little different than mine, that wasn't as big of a deal as it was during my youth, and even then, it wasn't as unacceptable then as it currently is now. We didn't know what gay was, we were eight years old, we weren't calling each other fags because we knew what homosexuality was and wanted to seriously and purposefully offend and hurt gay men, we just knew it was a word we shouldn't use, and in assuming that, we figured, "if we can't say it, it must mean something bad, and I want to call Jimmy over here something bad because he pushed me on the playground at recess, I'll call him a fag and that'll show him."
Consequently, I grew up when the AIDS epidemic was being acknowledged in a culture where homosexuality was either 1) unacceptable or 2) ignored and not talked about in hopes that would make it go away or some silly thing like that. As I was growing up and as I came of age, society started to realize, "hey, these people are human beings who love another human being and maybe the sex of either person doesn't really make that big of a difference and we're making a big deal over nothing," and slowly, we started to comprehend that being gay was NOT bad and it was hugely inappropriate to use gay, fag, dyke, etc., as insults designed to put people down. Adults chewed our asses and lectured us when we used the word, and we grew weary of the ass chewings and lectures that the term "fag" was used less and less as I grew up.
You, on the other hand, grew up in a time and place where homosexuality wasn't really a thing, most people didn't know a gay person, (or thought they didn't), so they didn't have the same reference level as I did, given my uncle was gay, as were all of his friends he brought home whose family disowned them simply for revealing their identity and being honest about themselves. They got dumped by their family, and the Pope family swooped in to snatch them up and make 'em one of us. (What? The Popes collect orphans. If your family doesn't want you for whatever stupid reason, don't worry, Baby, the Popes do. Get your ass over here and hang out with us!) I had that life experience where I knew and loved someone who was gay and, therefore, had a different idea of what gay was, its use as an insult, etc., that you did not have, and that isn't to your discredit. It's simply a matter that I grew up in this time and place, and you grew up in that one over there.
My offense to your use of "fag" is because society changed from when you were a youth to the time I was one. We decided, as a society and for the best, I feel, that insulting someone by using terms affiliated with homosexuality wasn't cool. It hurt people and we decided that we weren't going to do that. I'm sure you had zero intentions of hurting gay people as well, but society did not have the same opinions, acceptance or tolerance of the LGBTQ community that were prevalent in my childhood. "Fag" didn't change, that's the same word; its meaning and its acceptability to be used to hurt others, (or absolute lack thereof), that changed from your childhood and mine.
I personally detest the word, I will NOT use it under any circumstance. And as wishy washy as it sounds, I will also not tell a person they can't use it because controlling everyone else's expressions is not my place or my business. I will politely and quietly request the term not be used in my presence, but that's the end of it. I don't lecture about it or chew ass, I just ask and let it go from there. I also try to remember that if you say that word, based on society's opinions during your childhood, it may not mean what it means to me. I want to stand up for everyone, but even if I did, I might be standing up for someone who was never a target of the insult to begin with. A word can mean one thing to one person during a certain time and then something completely different six months later. That's partially why I don't lecture about "hurtful words," because I am not certain that the word I'm hearing is the word the other person is meaning.
So I took momentary offense, and yes, it was a knee jerk reaction, but I was able to stop and see that my association with the word's meaning may be 110% different than yours, which is exactly the point your entry makes.
MLP
When I was of the age when your superiority was determined by who could call you the most offensive name you could think up, "fag" was unacceptable. Don't read that as, "we didn't use the word," just that, "be prepared for an ass chewing and subsequent lecture if an adult heard you use it." It's not that we didn't say "fag," we just made sure we said it out of earshot of adults. I used it before I understood what it really meant and how it was intended to hurt a certain group of people, and I'm not proud of that, but I am also not going to pretend I didn't use it while hurling insults at kids who pissed me off. I'm not perfect.
But when you were growing up in a time a little different than mine, that wasn't as big of a deal as it was during my youth, and even then, it wasn't as unacceptable then as it currently is now. We didn't know what gay was, we were eight years old, we weren't calling each other fags because we knew what homosexuality was and wanted to seriously and purposefully offend and hurt gay men, we just knew it was a word we shouldn't use, and in assuming that, we figured, "if we can't say it, it must mean something bad, and I want to call Jimmy over here something bad because he pushed me on the playground at recess, I'll call him a fag and that'll show him."
Consequently, I grew up when the AIDS epidemic was being acknowledged in a culture where homosexuality was either 1) unacceptable or 2) ignored and not talked about in hopes that would make it go away or some silly thing like that. As I was growing up and as I came of age, society started to realize, "hey, these people are human beings who love another human being and maybe the sex of either person doesn't really make that big of a difference and we're making a big deal over nothing," and slowly, we started to comprehend that being gay was NOT bad and it was hugely inappropriate to use gay, fag, dyke, etc., as insults designed to put people down. Adults chewed our asses and lectured us when we used the word, and we grew weary of the ass chewings and lectures that the term "fag" was used less and less as I grew up.
You, on the other hand, grew up in a time and place where homosexuality wasn't really a thing, most people didn't know a gay person, (or thought they didn't), so they didn't have the same reference level as I did, given my uncle was gay, as were all of his friends he brought home whose family disowned them simply for revealing their identity and being honest about themselves. They got dumped by their family, and the Pope family swooped in to snatch them up and make 'em one of us. (What? The Popes collect orphans. If your family doesn't want you for whatever stupid reason, don't worry, Baby, the Popes do. Get your ass over here and hang out with us!) I had that life experience where I knew and loved someone who was gay and, therefore, had a different idea of what gay was, its use as an insult, etc., that you did not have, and that isn't to your discredit. It's simply a matter that I grew up in this time and place, and you grew up in that one over there.
My offense to your use of "fag" is because society changed from when you were a youth to the time I was one. We decided, as a society and for the best, I feel, that insulting someone by using terms affiliated with homosexuality wasn't cool. It hurt people and we decided that we weren't going to do that. I'm sure you had zero intentions of hurting gay people as well, but society did not have the same opinions, acceptance or tolerance of the LGBTQ community that were prevalent in my childhood. "Fag" didn't change, that's the same word; its meaning and its acceptability to be used to hurt others, (or absolute lack thereof), that changed from your childhood and mine.
I personally detest the word, I will NOT use it under any circumstance. And as wishy washy as it sounds, I will also not tell a person they can't use it because controlling everyone else's expressions is not my place or my business. I will politely and quietly request the term not be used in my presence, but that's the end of it. I don't lecture about it or chew ass, I just ask and let it go from there. I also try to remember that if you say that word, based on society's opinions during your childhood, it may not mean what it means to me. I want to stand up for everyone, but even if I did, I might be standing up for someone who was never a target of the insult to begin with. A word can mean one thing to one person during a certain time and then something completely different six months later. That's partially why I don't lecture about "hurtful words," because I am not certain that the word I'm hearing is the word the other person is meaning.
So I took momentary offense, and yes, it was a knee jerk reaction, but I was able to stop and see that my association with the word's meaning may be 110% different than yours, which is exactly the point your entry makes.
MLP